Interactive method

Build and interpret a risk matrix

A delivery may arrive late. Place it on a likelihood–impact grid, compare other risks, and see what changes when an assessment moves.

Place a risk

Likelihood × impact

Impact rises upwards; likelihood rises to the right. Each square shows its score and all risks placed there.

Five-by-five risk matrix
Impact ↑ / Likelihood →1 · Rare2 · Unlikely3 · Possible4 · Likely5 · Almost certain

Low: 1–5 Moderate: 6–15 High: 16–25

These bands belong to this example. They are not universal risk-acceptance thresholds.

Risk register

No risks placed yet. Add your first risk or try the materials example.

Your entries stay in this page only; reloading starts a new workshop.

How to read this matrix

  1. Agree the scales first. Here, likelihood runs from rare (1) to almost certain (5), and impact from minimal (1) to severe (5). For a real discussion, agree a time horizon and what each consequence rating means.
  2. Multiply the two ratings. Likelihood × impact gives this tool’s score. The upper-right cells have both high likelihood and high impact. The band helps organise discussion about mitigation, contingency and monitoring.
  3. Keep the event visible. Place each named risk and revisit its assessment. A shared cell can contain several different events; one does not replace another.

Try: delayed materials

A likelihood of 3 and impact of 5 gives 15: Moderate under this tool’s rules. It sits in the top row, middle column. Raise likelihood to 4 and the score becomes 20: High. Discuss buffer scheduling or contingency planning in either case; a severe consequence still deserves attention.

What the score leaves out

The numbers here are ordered ratings, not measured probabilities or currency. A score of 20 does not mean twice the expected loss of 10. The same score can also hide different combinations, such as 1 × 5 and 5 × 1. Read both axes and the event description before choosing a response.

This simple grid does not model uncertainty, linked risks, existing controls or risk appetite. For a fuller assessment, consider those alongside likelihood and consequences. HM Treasury’s Orange Book describes these wider assessment considerations.