Early enquiry · AI interpretation · Concept geometry sketch

How well can AI make sense of interfaces, topology and system architecture? This variant makes one interpretation of the shared fictional brief available for inspection. Inspect boundary features, toggle illustrative bands, and compare plan and section interpretations.

← All six Tangled Triangle variants Later enquiry: local-to-global compatibility →

Tangled Triangle — conceptual boundary geometry (interactive plan + section)

Click or hover any feature to see what it represents and how it constrains the site. This is a concept-stage sketch of the topology you described: canal (south, ground level), road (west, bridging the canal), railway (NW–SE on a viaduct crossing road + canal), mining passage (~10 m below, W–E), and HV line (N–S overhead).

Conceptual • not to scale • interface/topology focus

Layers

Site footprint Primary

Canal (south) Ground

Road (west) Bridge

Railway (NW–SE) Viaduct

HV line (N–S) Overhead

Mining passage (W–E) Below

Interface nodes Hotspots

Safeguarding

Show indicative bands Concept

These translucent “bands” are not real distances—they’re there only to help visualise that each corridor brings a working envelope / exclusion zone / consent boundary.

View

Section A–A is a conceptual longitudinal section along the road corridor: you encounter the rail viaduct over road and the road bridge over canal; the mine is shown beneath and the HV line above.

Plan: triangle of constraints formed by the intersections of (a) the canal, (b) the road, and (c) the railway line. The rail is shown as an elevated viaduct crossing both road and canal; the mine is below; the HV line is overhead.

Section A–A: schematic “constraint stack” along the road. The two principal hard interfaces shown are rail over road and road over canal, with HV overhead and mine below.